Right of reply
The right of reply in Mexico (derecho de réplica)
Short answer
- Law
- Ley Reglamentaria del Artículo 6o. en materia del Derecho de Réplica 1
- First published
- DOF, 4 November 2015 2
- Request window
- 15 business days from the day after publication 1
- Outlet decision
- Within three business days 1
- Court filing
- Within five business days 1
- Last reform
- DOF, 14 November 2025 2
Who may reply
Article 3 lets any person exercise the right over inaccurate or false information 1. If the person lacks capacity or has died, a spouse, partner or close relative may act. Companies act through a legal representative 1. The right of reply means publishing the clarifications that are relevant, and publication must be free 1. If the original was a paid insertion, the outlet may recover the cost from whoever ordered it 1.
Deadlines step by step
Non-daily programmes and publications run the reply in the next broadcast or edition 1.
| Step | Deadline |
|---|---|
| Written request to the outlet | 15 business days, from the day after publication 1 |
| Outlet decides if it is admissible | Three business days 1 |
| Outlet notifies its decision | Three business days after deciding 1 |
| Publication in daily media | Next business day 1 |
| Publication by a news agency | Within 24 hours 1 |
| Court claim | Five business days 1 |
| Defendant's answer | Four business days after service 1 |
| Court-ordered publication | Three business days after notice of judgment 1 |
Length and placement
The reply is limited to the information that prompted it and may not exceed the time or space of the original, except where the parties or a court agree otherwise. It may not contain judgments or opinions 1. In print it runs in full, on the same page, with similar features and prominence. On air it runs in the same programme and time slot 1.
When an outlet may refuse
The outlet must give reasons for any refusal and notify the requester 1. Federal district judges hear disputes, in the district where the requester lives 1.
- The request was not filed on time 1
- It is not limited to clarifying inaccurate information that caused harm 1
- The information was already clarified with equal prominence 1
- It concerns official statements by a public servant reported by an agency or outlet 1
- The information came from a cited news agency 1
The 2018 Supreme Court ruling
The National Human Rights Commission and two political parties challenged the law. The Supreme Court ruled on 1 February 2018 in Acción de Inconstitucionalidad 122/2015 and its accumulated cases 3. It invalidated a rule that only the affected party could reply in electoral matters, a faster timeline limited to campaigns, a five-business-day request window, refusal grounds IV and V of Article 19, and a clause on proof of harm 3.
The court found the five-day window, counted from the day after publication, disproportionate. That invalidity was set to take effect 90 calendar days after the ruling was published in the DOF, so Congress could fix it 3. The ruling was published in the DOF on 24 April 2018 and Congress reformed Article 10 on 30 May 2018 2. Further reforms followed on 1 April 2024 and 14 November 2025 2.
Fines
A district judge imposes the fines and the Ministry of Finance collects them 1. Mexico's law sits under Article 14 of the American Convention, which the Inter-American Court in 1986 called an internationally enforceable right 4,5.
Common questions
How many days do I have to request a reply in Mexico?
15 business days, counted from the day after publication or broadcast 1.
Can a newspaper charge for publishing my reply?
No. Publication must be free 1.
Why was the original deadline changed?
The Supreme Court found the five-business-day window disproportionate in 2018 3.
Can an outlet refuse a reply to a government press statement?
Yes. Official statements by public servants reported by an agency or outlet are a listed ground 1.
Who enforces the right?
Federal district judges, with fines collected by the Ministry of Finance 1.
Rules and charges change. Check the official source linked on this page before you pay or travel. Spotted an error? Email hello@responseofrecord.com.
Sources
- Cámara de Diputados: Ley Reglamentaria del Artículo 6o., Párrafo Primero, de la Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, en Materia del Derecho de Réplica (last reform DOF 14 November 2025)
- Cámara de Diputados: Ley Reglamentaria del artículo 6o. en materia del Derecho de Réplica, Decretos de Reforma
- Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación, Human Rights Office: Right of Reply, extract of Acción de Inconstitucionalidad 122/2015 and its accumulated cases 124/2015 and 125/2015
- Organization of American States: American Convention on Human Rights, Pact of San José, Costa Rica (B-32)
- Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Advisory Opinion of 29 August 1986, Enforceability of the Right to Reply or Correction (Arts. 14(1), 1(1) and 2 American Convention on Human Rights)
Related
- The right of reply in Brazil (Law 13.188 of 2015)
How Brazil's direito de resposta works under Law 13.188 of 2015: 60-day request window, 7-day publication period, court rite and the 2021 ruling.
- Statutory right of reply by country
How France, Germany, Spain, the EU and the US treat the right of reply in law, with deadlines, length limits and court routes from official texts.
- The right of reply explained
What a right of reply is, who can use it, what a medium must publish and when it may refuse, based on Council of Europe texts, EU law and national laws.
- How formal replies are published
Rules on where and how a reply must appear: same prominence, same typeface, no comment, archive links, Command Papers and tabled responses.